A Fatwa on Football
Monday October 31, 2005
Ok I found this at Guardian Online (and I wrote to their editors asking if they knew about it, or if they were serious or not given that The Guardian is a serious media outlet), you might find it mildly amusing
The legal opinions proclaimed by Islamic scholars, known as fatwas, have proliferated in the Muslim world since the 1980s. The growth in fatwas - some of them contradictory - has led to debate over who can legitimately issue them. As part of a government drive to eliminate frivolous fatwas, the Saudi newspaper Al Watan recently published one such edict setting out new rules for football. We publish an edited translation below.
In the name of God the merciful and benevolent:
- International terminology that heretics use, such as “foul,” “penalty”, “corner,” “goal”, “out” and others, should be abandoned and not said. Whoever says them should be punished and ejected from the game.
- Do not call “foul” and stop the game if someone falls and sprains a hand or foot or the ball touches his hand, and do not give a yellow or red card to whoever was responsible for the injury or tackle. Instead, it should be adjudicated according to Sharia rulings concerning broken bones and injuries.
- Do not follow the heretics, the Jews, the Christians and especially evil America regarding the number of players. Do not play with 11 people. Add to this number or decrease it.
- Play in your regular clothes or your pyjamas or something like that, but not coloured shorts and numbered T-shirts, because shorts and T-shirts are not Muslim clothing. Rather, they are heretical and western clothing, so beware of imitating their fashion.
- If you have fulfilled these conditions and intend to play soccer, play to strengthen the body in order better to struggle in the way of God on high and to prepare the body for when it is called to jihad. Soccer is not for passing time or the thrill of so-called victory.
- Do not play in two halves. Rather, play in one half or three halves in order to completely differentiate yourselves from the heretics, the corrupted and the disobedient.
- If neither of you beats the other, or “wins”, as it is called, and neither puts the leather between the posts, do not add extra time or penalties. Instead leave the field, because winning with extra time and penalty kicks is the pinnacle of imitating heretics and international rules.
- Young crowds should not gather to watch when you play because if you are there for the sake of sports and strengthening your bodies as you claimed, why would people watch you? You should make them join your physical fitness and jihad preparation, or you should say: “Go proselytise and seek out morally reprehensible acts in the markets and the press and leave us to our physical fitness.”
- You should spit in the face of whoever puts the ball between the posts or uprights and then runs in order to get his friends to follow him and hug him like players in America or France do, and you should punish him, for what is the relationship between celebrating, hugging and kissing and the sports that you are practising?
- You should use two posts instead of three pieces of wood or steel that you erect in order to put the ball between them, meaning that you should remove the crossbar in order not to imitate the heretics and in order to be entirely distinct from the soccer system’s despotic international rules.
- Do not do what is called “substitution,” that is, taking the place of someone who has fallen, because this is a practice of the heretics in America and elsewhere.
Now I thought it was a joke, like I said, but The Guardian is a serious UK newspaper (left-leaning), and I think that their online compatriot, Guardian Online, is similarly serious. So if it is a real article, and not a spoof, I have to admit it’s a bit racy for them to be posting/printing. So we’ll see if they have anything to say about it ![]()










Comments • [feed]
Comment 1
I say, sentence these fathead-was to cleaning the pigskins at all high school, college and pro football games.
And while we’re at it, sentence them to a full year eating nothing but SPAM. Lots and lots of SPAM.
With their left hands.
(BTW, in case it had slipped past you, I have no use for these creeps. Just thought I might clear that up. heh
David commented on October 31st, 2005
Comment 2 [ Administrator Reply ]
LOL @ David! SPAM! Poor schmucks!
rich commented on October 31st, 2005
Comment 3
I can’t believe that’s not a joke.
My favorite part:
“You should spit in the face of whoever… runs in order to get his friends to follow him and hug him like players in America or France do”
What a load of hatred and venom.
JJ commented on October 31st, 2005
Comment 4 [ Administrator Reply ]
JJ me too, I am simply amazed that The Guardian printed it! What on earth are they thinking? So now, mainstream media outlets are the tools of hatred-spewing radicals?! I am still waiting to hear from the editors there…
rich commented on October 31st, 2005
Comment 5
It’s got to be a joke. Was the publication date April 1st? Is the person responsible for the story known for satire?
BTW: why is the word “soccer” used in the translation? Was the translation supplied by an American. Wouldn’t the Guardian opt for “football”?
daniel commented on November 1st, 2005
Comment 6
That’s ….. believable considering where they say it’s coming from. I’m still laughing at “one half or three halves.”
mel commented on November 1st, 2005
Comment 7 [ Administrator Reply ]
Daniel, no, it wasn’t April 1st. I agree on the translation error, odd. But then again, many British newspapers employ American journalists (and vice versa).
rich commented on November 1st, 2005
This blog requires you to login before replying. If you do not have an account you can create one (for free!).